For each of the following inductive arguments, do the following: First, reconstruct the argument, including any implicit premises. Second, state the type of inductive argument employed as you understand it (statistical syllogism, inductive generalization, argument from analogy, or inference to the best explanation), and then explain why you have interpreted the argument as one of this type, rather than some other type. Finally, describe what you would consider to be a plausible undercutting defeater for this argument. 1. The public, in general, seemed to be quite willing to accept the testimony of former high-ranking Facebook employee, Sarah Wynn-Williams; and this fact is surprising, given how quick the public was to reject the testimony of former FBI agent Garret O’Boyle. WynnWilliams recently claimed that Meta (Facebook’s parent company) gave the Chinese Communist Party access to Meta users’ data, while O’Boyle recently claimed that, under the Biden administration, the FBI conducted politically-motivated criminal investigations against conservatives; but do we actually have good reasons to treat these cases differently? Perhaps you will point out that O’Boyle’s position was such that we would not expect him to have first-hand knowledge of the activities that he testified about. And that’s true; but WynnWilliams’s position was such that we would not expect her to have such knowledge either. Perhaps you will point out that, given the money to be made from such claims (e.g., in the form of book deals), that O’Boyle had strong incentives to lie. And that’s also true; but the very same can be said of Wynn-Williams. Perhaps you will point out that we, as ordinary members of the public, have no independent evidence of any kind that could corroborate O’Boyle’s testimony about a government agency. However, we have no independent evidence that could corroborate Wynn-Williams’s testimony either. Perhaps you will point out that O’Boyle’s claims were completely extraordinary. However, Wynn-Williams’s claims of Meta conspiring with the Chinese government were also extraordinary. Given all of these facts, then, shouldn’t we refuse to believe Wynn-Williams when she tells us that Meta gave the Chinese Communist Party access to Meta users’ data?